-
It is not likely to ignore them. Rich text is XHTML not HTML... therefore it has to follow the XHTML standards.
-
I don't know that SharePoint will let you do that. However, you might be able to create a custom web part that does it using the following tutorial:
Display Inline Pictures From a Rich Text Field on a Web Pagehttp://www.infopathdev.com/howto/tutorials/default.aspx?i=46622d199b5f4042acecc1953b55676a
Good luck! Hope this helps some.
-
Thanks for the suggestions
-
Where exactly is the object required error coming from? If your form is not set to full-trust, then it might be coming from the creation of the ActiveX control.
-
Without having multiple text boxes, each with their own format and set to hide if the selected currency is not their own format, there's not a way to do it.
An alternative is to have a field somewhere that holds the current currecy symbol, and you display that as an expression box before each currency-type field in your view, and then not have ...
-
Thanks for your kind words!
-
Hello,
I'm Checco from Italy, I'm sorry for my terrible english...
In SharePoint 2003 I created a form library with a template in Infopath 2003.
The people generate a new module, from the template, and insert some data and one picture.
When the people save the file in the library I'd like to trasfer also this picture in the library, but this is ...
-
Ah yes, my mistake. I forgot that rule actions don't let you modify the field xpath. Unfortunately, it is set up so that if you try to edit them manually, it causes further problems.
What happens with rules where you set a value in a repeating list is that the value of each mathing field in every row gets updated. This is sometimes helpful, but ...
-
Glad you got that part figured out. Code is not affected by designer changes--you have to keep that up-to-date manually.
Try removing the onload code (or as much as possible) and see what difference that makes. Perhaps there is something very inefficient happening.
Also, if you have any OnAfterChange events, make sure that those aren't getting ...
-
You might need to do some work to get some cleanup to happen the, like haveing a rule one the field which sets the field with a substring of itself... or perhaps have your comparison just compare the strings before any ''T'' character (if it exists).
Not sure why the web site is serving up the old form...