-
Thanks for confirming the behavior and that it is something in the form. I will try the systematic approach you suggested and follow up.
Thanks for your time.
-
No, I'm sorry -- I'm not terribly JScript savvy, I use C# -- so I was just going by what I could find online....
-
Hi All,
I have form which needs C# code to implement the required functionlaity - therefore it has to be an "Administrator-Approved Template". Now I have a number of rich-text boxes on the form which I want to promote to the form library (for reporting purposes) as "multiple lines of text" columns i.e. longer than 255 ...
-
No, I don't think you are missing something big, I think you running into InfoPath limitations with DB bound forms. I think if you structure your database differently, it will allow you to do what you need. Perhaps instead of using the assignedTo value as your key (since it can change) you could add an auto-incrementing Id (not ...
-
Are you connecting to the supplier table first and then adding the customer table? You say you are getting a message about a 'many to one' relationship, but since you state there will only be one supplier per customer, you would need to make that your primary table.
-
If a control is not in a repeating section and is bound to a field in a repeating group in the data source, you may see this message. You may also see it if you try to bind a control to secondary data source field (even if it is repeating) when the control is on the form in a section that is NOT bound to the same secondary data source.....
-
I am using Infopath 2007 SP1 and have recently lost the ability to access any programming related options. There are no errors but the following items are all gone:
Tools menu - Programming
The entire section related to code in the Form Options - Programming section (I still have the custom task pane section but nothing below ...
-
First off, nice looking form! Second off, you are not crazy -- I am seeing exactly the same thing on my machine. I started a new blank form for comparison and added two optional section, making the ability to add / remove one dependent upon the presence of the other (like you have in your form) and it worked beautifully. On your form, I added some ...
-
-
Well, unless the checkboxes have a value of "no" when they are checked, I believe you should probably have a different value in those quotation marks. (My guess is that it should be "yes".)