InfoPath Dev

You'll need to verify that you have your filter set up correctly. If you have the #2 filter working correctly using the #1 value, the #3 should work in a nearly identical way. I'd review to make sure it was added correctly. The other thing you will want to consider is the fact that #3 will probably need to filter against the values for ...

You have to work around the limitations by using conditional formatting to hide all but the row number selected from your button click: count(preceding-sibling::ns1:Row) != [SELECTED_ROW_NUMBER_HERE] Depending on how you have it set up, the count might be 1 less than the number you have selected, so you would add one to make them ...

Hi Alf, Site is just an XPathNavigator node, so you treat it like any other and use Site.SelectSingleNode(".."); to get the parent node. Or if you know that your XML structure is always going to start with a node named "my:CompanyTable" then you can traverse back using ...

DD1 = your first drop-down / DD2 = your second drop-down What you have going on is that the DD1 values query on load. The DD2 values query when DD1 changes (since the list is filtered). The value for DD1 does not change on load, and thus the DD2 values are not queried. The fix is to add a loading rule which queries the DD2 values if ...

Without a copy of your actual form template it is difficult to know exactly what is going on. However, the following list should resolve some of your issues and head you in a direction of resolving others. 1.  The yellow text under the title is most likely an expression box. Set the background shading on the expression box to be the same ...

Unfortunately, InfoPath only allows email data connections to either send the form as an attachment or to send the current view. It would be nice to be able to choose to send neither. But with that in mind, it sounds like your best choice is to send the view. Here you could have a separate view that gets sent, but you must know that it ...

You are correct, you cannot do this without using current(). The problem with your approach is that it is starting at the root node of your main DOM and looking for ANY my:CostOrg that is part of ANY my:group11 table. This is why you are experiencing what you are. When you start from the root node, there's not much you can do to prevent that ...

You will need code for this. You can use the SelectText or SelectNodes methods. Outside that, consider placing a field at the top of the form and give it an accelerator key (like ALT+T) and have the users type that key sequence to return to the top.

What exactly are you trying to do with it? Set a single field's value with multiple names? Are you using rules or code? With rules you will need to do a web search on how to use the eval() method. If code, you should be able to loop through all matching fields and build your own concatenated value.