InfoPath Dev

Euw. IP and printing can be a beast. I guess if it were my form, I'd see if the text boxes were in a layout table to start with... Honestly, if it were my form, the first thing I'd try to do is reproduce the issue in a new form, then start backtracking from there. Do you use the Print Preview button and a print view? Or is just a direct ...

Can't you use the same conditional formatting on the checkbox - based on user name, or if you are using InfoPath Filler, user role?

Hi - to the best of my knowledge, there is no way around this.

You'll have to write code, I'm afraid, and the form will need to be filler and full trust. Here's an MSDN page that has a code sample.

So - what is your desired end result? A form that submits data to SharePoint Lists? InfoPath doesn't do that out of the box (I should say - you can create SharePoint List forms, and they will submit to a single list - but it sounds like you have a more complex relationship set up here). Are all these tables secondary data connections in your ...

You could try the Spsearch Web Service (more info here). I have no idea if it is InfoPath friendly, though....

You are correct I built the database using MS Access and then imported the tables onto my sharepoint site. The conditional formatting makes perfect sense and I will implement that as well. My concern is that currently I am not able to display information from all three tables. I can see the project information and the deliverables table as ...

Off hand, I think it may because you are going back to the testDoc variable to create elements and select things - instead of just working with the current graphNode - does that make sense? Your graphsElement needs to be instantiated inside your foreach loop, too, I think - because the second time that loop runs is when you are adding all those ...

 ok I'd appreciate if you could see as much would serve me I'll be looking forward to the response and information

I am unwilling to publically confess how long it took me to find conditional formatting in IP 2010. I actually thought for a while I had found a bug - that they had forgotten it. :-)