InfoPath Dev

Hi, I'm a new to qRules, but not InfoPath. I have been developing for a few years with just out of the box features. I finally made jump and just installed v8.1 trial version. I confirmed with SP Admin that sandbox is enabled so I proceeded with publishing an empty injected form just to make sure it can ...

I have timeEntry (repeating) [Date] & [HoursWorked] I have a Summary textfield, I added this as the formula for Summary: xdMath:Eval(xdMath:Eval(../my:timeEntry, 'concat(my:Date, ": ", my:HoursWorked, ";")'), "..") 2018-01-09: 8;2018-01-10:9; .... Now, instead of ';', I would like to add ...

So goooooddd. Thank you for your time & expertise.

 Hi,  I don't have the whole solution to your problem, but I have the piece where you can always start the week on Sunday regardless what date was picked from the DatePick or today(). For example: if 05/11/2017 picked, the week starts on Sunday 05/07/2017 Create Data type Whole Number ...

 Here is the XPath on the Count of Rec field: count(xdXDocument:GetDOM("RECList")/data-set/record/RECNum[../BUNum = xdXDocument:GetDOM("BUList")/data-set/record/BUNum])  The result:   Image of result: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxlPX1FIi-PDeFRPQWEwSzgtZXM/view  Here is the xsn file: ...

Hi there, If the field's data type is Date then you can use the format 14 March, 2001.   As far as why it's displaying then you have to check the 'calculating rules'. Your post didn't provide enough info for any further recommendation.

 I have to SP lists List 1: BU List BU#1 BUName1 BU#2 BUName2 BU#3 BUName3 List 2: REC List BU#1 REC#1 RECName1 BU#1 REC#2 RECName2 BU#3 REC#3 RECName3 BU#3 REC#4 RECName4 BU#3 REC#5 RECName5 I have an IP form with connections to BU List & REC List I would like to have a repeating table to display BU List with 1 ...

Hi Rodman, Let's call the text field that houses the Engineer's name is txtEName. When GetUserProfileByName runs, we check txtEName field. If txtEName is blank then place the FullName from Getuser to txtEName; otherwise, just don't do anything. Logic behind: When Engineer creates the form, the txtEName must be blank so ...