-
I sometimes try to admin approve a template that won't sandbox - and then get a better error message about why it isn't browser compatible.
Next time - send me your template. I'll try to admin approve it on one of our ShP servers and we'll see if we can get a better error message. :-)
-
The XPath is a relative path - since the formatting is on d:SharePointListItem_RW, that's where we start with the XPath - think of it as driving directions - if I'm at the North Pole, how do I get to New York? If I'm at the South Pole, would the directions be different?
Your first attempt was an absolute path - starting at the root ...
-
I would add a list that is bound to the same repeating field as the multi-select. See attached sample form - I also had to set the default data to not include the field bound to the multi-select by default. Save the form locally, right click and select Design to open, then you can preview.
-
I'm a little confused by your publishing process - sounds like maybe InfoPath is too.
Is your "Staff_Performance_Review" library set to use the content type under the library settings?
-
Go take a look at the logic on the helper field - since that field is inside the repeating group, the rules it runs only affect the instances of the other fields inside the same group.
-
You can do this with a preceding-sibling formula. You'll want to hide rows where the preceding sibling agenda item and the line comment are the same. I'm attaching a simple sample - save the linked form (in the heading of the post) locally, right click the saved file, and select design. Then preview it. There are two instances of ...
-
It is saved as an IP 2007 template (I just double checked). When you download it, right click and select design from the locally saved file - is that how you tried to open it?
-
What happens if you try the sum formula w/out the filter ([. != ""])? Still NaN (Not a Number)?
-
Oh. This was fun!
Attaching your sample with some edits - I added a "helper" field in the repeating group to leverage for the rule actions.
-
Oh, cool, thanks for posting back on this.