InfoPath Dev

I've noticed that Report Builder 3.0 only returns values from the default view of the list.  Does your default view actually have any items in it?

Hi nine1987, follow Hillary's instructions posted above: Save the linked file locally (right click link, select save as). Navigate to the locally saved file. Right click the file and select Design - then you can open the form in design mode. RaYvA

Hi nerdifiedgeek, this should work ootb. Make sure that the GUID is enclodes in braces {....} and also make sure that the web address for the data connection is pointing to your server. If al else fails, delete everything you've attempted to do and start again following the instructions carefully.  Everything in the form is quiet self ...

While attempting to do something similar with the data connection files from our testing to prod environments I noticed that when I uploaded the data connection files to prod if there were spaces in the file names they were replaced with underscores '_'.  This then wouldn't allow my form to open when it was published to prod. So ...

Hi Hitch, that's an interesting question!  I had thought about it and then decided that I couldn't find a Use Case for it, but then why did I think of it? Can you explain why you would want to do this? Technically, there is no reason why you couldn't edit the items from the repeating table AFTER they have been submitted, ...

[quote user="Hilary Stoupa"] Save the linked file locally (right click link, select save as). Navigate to the locally saved file. Right click the file and select Design - then you can open the form in design mode.[/quote]Thanks Hilary :)

[quote user="daniel.christian"]Hi Amieqq, I too am a no-code solution guy using InfoPath and SharePoint designer. This article you wrote is very inspiring especially since I am working on something very similar to what you just did except that it is the opposite. I am attempting to do a search on a BCS connection using an InfoPath form. ...

Here's a sample screenshot with over a 100 submitted lines!

Hi Kirk,  It shouldn't matter that you have a fixed number of rows, it should sumbit as many rows as there are to submit. I have attached an updated form, I think the previous one ran into the 16 rule depth limit because I was silly and used '.+1' instead of 'count(preceding-sibling::group2) + 1' to increment the submit ...

ARGH! I just edited the last post and included a form that gets the ID of the item posted with a nicely worded verbose explanation of the three additional rules that perform this.  The form has been attached so you can have a play with it, hopefully I will get around to re writing how it works sometime shortly especially if someone wants to ...