-
Unfortunately, InfoPath will not out of the box copy repeating data from one data source to another, which it sounds like you are trying to do? You can use custom code (or qRules) for this. But maybe you just need to display the case management data?
-
Rules fire when the field they are on changes. So - for example - you might put a rule on the Method field to clear the Check field every time it changes. Then you could put rules on the Check field to clear its dependent fields... make sense? I wouldn't even bother with conditions. When Method changes, clear Check. When Check changes, ...
-
Okay - just to wrap this post up, after looking at the template, the issue had to do with the location of the submit button. The XPath was invalid because it wasn't relative to the actual button location. Here's how to use InfoPath to test your expression -Add another condition on the buttonJust leave the first & second dropdowns ...
-
I just emailed you via your forum email address, so you can reply with the template. It may be tomorrow before I can take a look. :)
-
Nope - I know it is a drag, but it just the way it all works. So, you'll just have to add rules to clear these fields, I'm afraid. It is boring, but easy, and will be done faster than you think. :)
-
This post has a code sample that shows how to execute a web service query:
http://www.infopathdev.com/forums/t/10879.aspx
So - you can execute your query and catch any exceptions. If there is an exception, you can set the query field to the user name with the other domain and try again.
-
I went ahead and took the form down for you - I'd grabbed a copy already. I get what you are saying now. Can you put the various sections dependent upon (for example) the Check group into the Check section? So that when you select Check from MethodGroup and the check section shows, all those groups (that hide or show based on the selection of ...
-
Okay - so, I'm sorry to be slow - can you clarify what currently happens and what you expect to have happen? I see you have conditional formatting on the various sections, and I'm assuming that works as anticipated - so what is the part that doesn't do what you expect?
-
Thanks for updating with your final working solution, Gwen! :)
-
Yuck - have you seen this post? It has some suggestions....