InfoPath Dev

The contact selection in 2007 and person/group picker in 2010 are almost the same control, but the latter has new and improved behavior.  If you solution needs to work on 2007, then the contact selector is probably your best bet. Here is an article about using the person/group picker: ...

In the publishing wizard, what "type" are you publishing as? Form library, content type, or admin approved template? Have you tried publishing a blank form and see if that works?

No code, just rules. Right-click on the XSN on the location where you saved it and select Design. It will open InfoPath in design mode. Please check out the rules in the dropdown by clicking on the dropdown box and then open Manage Rules in the Home tab (that is, if you're  using InfoPath 2010). In InfoPath 2007, you ...

Thanks Jo-Anne. Was this done in code or using a rule? After I made my post I looked around some more and realised I could do this by adding a rule to the drop down. I'm not sure how to dismantle an xsn file so couldn't look to see what you had done.

I don't believe there is a way to build logic into your form to tell it to open in the client or the browser depending on which case it is.  There may be a code solution that I'm not aware of. If you go into a document library and click on the dropdown for an InfoPath form, you will see two options: Edit in Browser and Edit in ...

Is this a browser form or filler form?  Have you checked the Tab Index property of your dropdown control?

DropdownFormula.xsn Hi:  I've attached a sample for you. Hope that helps!

Hi: You might want to check your permissions for that library. You should have at least contribute access with read/write/edit permissions.

It has been a long day and this code is giving me this error. System.NullReferenceException Object reference not set to an instance of an object.    at DPR_Library_5.FormCode.CTRL177_5_Clicked(Object sender, ClickedEventArgs e) in \\srv-na01\user\rep\InfoPath Projects\DPR_Library_Final_1_GetFile\FormCode.vb:line 76    at ...

[quote user="Hilary Stoupa"] I'd test that - download a category with fewer items (if you don't have one, perhaps you can create one? Or limit the number of rows some other way?) That is, simulate the scenario. Is the performance what you need? [/quote] Yes, a smaller category in my table (15 items) performs ...