InfoPath Dev

Looking at the documentation, I think you'll need to use namexpath instead. Is AttachSection your repeating group? I'd probably add a field there with a default calculated value that concats the system generated code with the file name - or whatever you wish to use. Then you can use namexpath=my:NewField (whatever the name of your field ...

Hi Hilary! I tried adding a concat function in the QRulesFilename part but it doesn't generate the filename. My formula is: concat("SaveToSharePoint /url=http://server/site/docLibrary /xpath=/my:Form/my:group36/my:group37/my:group38/my:AttachSection /name=", concat(SystemGeneratedCode,"_",@qRulesNewFileName)) Checking ...

Save the file linked in the header of this post locally (right click the link and select "save target as" or whatever the menu option is for your browser). Once you've saved the file, right click and select design to open in design mode. I just stuck a new table in with the component and description dropdowns and some screenshots ...

 Here's a quick demo on getting the email addresses for members of a group: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHO3o7kbV8k&feature=youtu.be

yeah, eliminated the checkbox. kind of like it more. Ok will wait for it. thank you so much for your feedbacks

Yeah, I would just let them add rows and have the controls show up. I'll get you an updated form later today that uses a single description field and an XML file for the values, so you can see how that works. Then you don't have quite as many conditional formatting rules to maintain.

yes, submitted to the email. I have not considered that to be honest and I would appreciate your help on that as I would not know where to start on that. no really a requirement. I made the design like that in case they wanted additional rows. Do you think I should just let them be able to add additional rows and the textbox just appear?

I should add - have you considered having a single field for the description and then using a secondary data source (like an XML or SharePoint list) for the values? Filtering could be used to only display the values based on the selection in the first dropdown (I can help you with that if you need it) .... I'm also a bit confused by the design ...

So - looking at the various data connections, I see several for "Hiboux" - one is from the default data connection for the lookup for the field labelled Hibou. The other two I'm guessing you created while working on this - but neither Hiboux1 or 2 include the Province column. We'd need that if the intent is to have the Hibou ...