-
On second thought, the number of questions in your form seems to be few enough that you could get by without using a more structured data source, but I would suggest using more descriptive names for your fields. It'll help when you're setting up your formulas.
-
This formula should do the trick:
count((field764 | field765 | field766)[. = 1])
But I think structuring your form with hundreds of fields named fieldNNNN is not the way to go. I'll try to send you an example of a better way to do it in the next day or two.
-
You need to use a relative XPath, relative my:gSecurityMember. both //my:mail and //my:gSecurityMember/my:mail are absolute paths and will always select the first my:mail node in the document.
-
If they're in separate fields, you can probably just add together their values with a plus symbol. Click the fx button to open the formula editor, and use the buttons there to select and insert the fields. You'll wind up with something.
field1 + field2 + field3
etc.
Incidentally, I would suggest using more ...
-
The container that's called "Section" is a Section Control.
-
A Section control can do the trick. You can apply conditional formatting to it to hide it when needed.
-
Sure. james dot rishe at qdabra dot com.
-
The formula would go in the summary field. I'm assuming you're currently using the sum() function to count the number of checked boxes, so it would be similar to that. Just use:
count(/full/path/to/your/radioButton/field[. = 'valueToCount'])
That's the most complete I can make it without actually ...
-
If you use radio buttons, you can use count(evaluation[. = 'O']), count(evaluation[. = 'C']), etc. to aggregate the summary values at the bottom.
-
Is there any reason you don't want to use a radio button?