<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.infopathdev.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SharePoint Integration</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/46.aspx</link><description> For questions concerning issues in the integration of SharePoint and Microsoft InfoPath.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)</generator><item><title>Read Only Copy</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/58371.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:35:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:58371</guid><dc:creator>ppmvisk</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/58371.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=46&amp;PostID=58371</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Using InfoPath, a workflow is started.&amp;nbsp; For each step in the workflow, different teams or people have active tasks pending at different times.&amp;nbsp; This all works as desired which means person 1 creates, person 2 validates, person 3 might have to do some testing and then post results, person 2 takes actions based on results, workflow ends.&amp;nbsp; During that time other people or other teams may want to know what all is in progress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The submit rules contain a process (web service using K2 BlackPearl) that creates a copy of the form for review.&amp;nbsp; So there are two forms librarys (active and backup copy).&amp;nbsp; The trouble is that if a back-up copy is opened in edit mode, the next user with the active copy who does a submit gets an error since the backup copy can not be deleted and re-saved by the process.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seemed simple to try unique permissions on the form library.&amp;nbsp; Testing that, contributors see the full set of options in the items drop-down list (such as &amp;quot;Edit in...&amp;quot;) but the read-only users still see the exact same thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Knowing that &amp;quot;form library&amp;quot; is special, the next test was creating a &amp;quot;document library&amp;quot; instead.&amp;nbsp; At first this was encouraging.&amp;nbsp; Contributors still had edit options and read-only users did not see those options.&amp;nbsp; But then when opening the form, instead of read-only, a &amp;quot;not authorized&amp;quot; error is raised.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All the posts and notes I&amp;#39;ve searched deal with one copy of one form.&amp;nbsp; Anybody deal with keeping two copies like this and having one be read-only?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>