<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.infopathdev.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Data Connections</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/44.aspx</link><description> </description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)</generator><item><title>Re: SharePoint list size limits for secondary data connection</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/49750.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:04:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:49750</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Halstead</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/49750.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=44&amp;PostID=49750</wfw:commentRss><description>FYI: You can contact Qdabra to get a free trial of qRules v2.0 that includes the 
Filter Owssvr functionality.</description></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint list size limits for secondary data connection</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/49746.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:50:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:49746</guid><dc:creator>RebeccaBing</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/49746.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=44&amp;PostID=49746</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Patrick,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That looks spot on, thank you. I will try the qrules to pull the data on demand first&amp;nbsp;but Qdabra looks great so I&amp;#39;ll&amp;nbsp;investigate that too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thank you very much for your response&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint list size limits for secondary data connection</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/49743.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:32:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:49743</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Halstead</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/49743.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=44&amp;PostID=49743</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Rebecca,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You need to filter the lists on the server to prevent pulling down all 600 items for each one. You can use Qdabra&amp;#39;s qRules v2.0 to do this without code - check out the FilterOwssvr example here: &lt;a href="http://www.infopathdev.com/files/folders/qrules/entry49214.aspx"&gt;http://www.infopathdev.com/files/folders/qrules/entry49214.aspx&lt;/a&gt;. There&amp;#39;s also a forum post on this here: &lt;a href="http://www.infopathdev.com/forums/p/13963/49740.aspx"&gt;http://www.infopathdev.com/forums/p/13963/49740.aspx&lt;/a&gt;. qRules gets injected into your form and because it reduces the amount of data pulled down from SharePoint you will see performance improvements as a result of a) less items in dropdown list, b) less time to download items. qRules works by calling built-in SharePoint functionality that filters a list. Normally you would have to write code for this, but qRules enables it using a rule. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another approach is to use a Web Service to filter on the server. Qdabra has a free trial download of WSSP that essentially does the same thing that qRules does. Here&amp;#39;s a link: &lt;a href="http://www.qdabra.com/en/products/wssp.aspx"&gt;http://www.qdabra.com/en/products/wssp.aspx&lt;/a&gt;. Note: you can use WSSP to filter items in SQL as well as SharePoint. Here&amp;#39;s a link to some Performance data showing how much faster it is to use WSSP than SharePoint alone: &lt;a href="http://www.infopathdev.com/blogs/ernesto/archive/2009/01/07/dbxl-v2-3-performance-analysis.aspx"&gt;http://www.infopathdev.com/blogs/ernesto/archive/2009/01/07/dbxl-v2-3-performance-analysis.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In summary, you can make it work by using server-side filtering. Filter Owssvr is one method and using a Web Service is another. Filter Owssvr requires code or qRules to use from the client. Web Service has to be implemented, or you can leverage the Qdabra&amp;#39;s free sample and if it works the Web Service is pretty cheap (~$500) and can be used for all of your forms. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SharePoint list size limits for secondary data connection</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/49737.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:19:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:49737</guid><dc:creator>RebeccaBing</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/49737.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=44&amp;PostID=49737</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have a form (MOSS 2007) that is running really slowly after adding 4 secondary data sources back to 4 SharePoint lists containing 600 odd entries each. &lt;br /&gt;There are 4 drop down lists linking to the 4 secondary data sources (clients split out A-C, D-F.. etc to reduce the size of the initial load from around 2000). &lt;br /&gt;When a client name is selected, 5 associated address fields are populated from the the name field. &lt;br /&gt;I have 8 views that progress a process:- &lt;br /&gt;1 - with the client drop down fields available for selection &lt;br /&gt;2 - with the client drop down fields in a hidden field so it has to be explicitely opened to update the data &lt;br /&gt;3 onwards - I have removed the drop down fields and replaced them with data fields that are not updatable, removing the hefty round trip. &lt;br /&gt;The latter forms load and process much more quickly but are still too slow! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I cannot find hard and fast limits for secondary data sources linked to lists, and I cannot think of a way to load the data even through code to spread the loading.. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The form needs access to this source data - any ideas? &lt;br /&gt;a) am I asked too much of my form to collect that much data? &lt;br /&gt;b) if I am, I can&amp;#39;t think of a way that will reduce or spread the collection..I&amp;#39;ve thought about coding to add the data &amp;#39;on-load&amp;#39; as xml to the form, but that just moves the problem.. I could split out the customer lists further to make them smaller..is this an acceptable request for InfoPath and a browser, in which case this is therefore a capacity issue with the MOSS server or more likely bandwidth between MOSS &amp;amp; SQL..?? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Am i asking too much? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;thanks anyone.. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>