<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.infopathdev.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Data Connections</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/44.aspx</link><description> </description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)</generator><item><title>Re: Performance Comparison</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/12187.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:35:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:12187</guid><dc:creator>jjones</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/12187.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=44&amp;PostID=12187</wfw:commentRss><description>Well, since SharePoint sits on top of SQL Server I would assume that it is no faster than SQL. However, given that SharePoint doesa LOT with SQL in terms of configuration, versioning, libraries, etc. I would have to guess that it is some significant percentage slower than SQL.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then again, this is a comparison between apples and oranges. This is like asking the perf difference between a Chevy Big Block engine and a Car that has a Chevy Big Block engine in it.&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Performance Comparison</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/12186.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:22:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:12186</guid><dc:creator>Matt Faus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/12186.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=44&amp;PostID=12186</wfw:commentRss><description>I haven't done testing for this, but my instinct would tell me that SQL DB is going to be considerably more performant, especially as your solution grows to large scales.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Storing data in a secondary data source is almost always a good idea. If you want other applications to also have easy access to the data, a database is a good idea, otherwise an XML document will usually suffice. However, a DB is easier to add/edit data items later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'll ask if anyone has experience with performance testing SharePoint vs. SQL.</description></item><item><title>Performance Comparison</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/12094.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:41:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:12094</guid><dc:creator>dlgross</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/12094.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=44&amp;PostID=12094</wfw:commentRss><description>Does anyone know how peformance compares when retrieving data from SQL DB vs a SharePoint list? If I have choice where to pull secondary data from, which should I choose? When should I include the data in the form itself?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TIA&lt;br /&gt;Dean</description></item></channel></rss>