<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.infopathdev.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Controls</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/43.aspx</link><description> </description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)</generator><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;spontaneous&amp;quot; instantiation of a repeating table</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11851.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:15:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:11851</guid><dc:creator>trufooser</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11851.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=11851</wfw:commentRss><description>i ran into this problem again today, fixed it a different way.  definatly a bug this time...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i had 1 parent table and 4 child tables.  the default values for the tables were all unchecked so they would not display on startup.  3 of the 4 child tables would 'spontaneously' create a new record when i created a new record in the parent table.  i went into the default values and checked them so they would appear on start-up of the form.  previewed the form, then went back in and unchecked the default values.  after unchecking them, all the child tables stopped inserting new records with the insertion of a new parent table.</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;spontaneous&amp;quot; instantiation of a repeating table</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11850.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:27:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:11850</guid><dc:creator>Greg Collins</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11850.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=11850</wfw:commentRss><description>Great! I'm glad to hear its working now. Keep up the good work!</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;spontaneous&amp;quot; instantiation of a repeating table</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11849.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:07:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:11849</guid><dc:creator>trufooser</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11849.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=11849</wfw:commentRss><description>problem fixed.  For me at least, it was the result of a poor database design.  I had it set up so that the parent table was an optional section, and at the same time, you did not need to enter information into the parent table to enter info into the child table.  i created new relationships with the parent table of the parent table (grandparent table??? lol), and it works like a charm.</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;spontaneous&amp;quot; instantiation of a repeating table</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11848.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:45:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:11848</guid><dc:creator>Greg Collins</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11848.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=11848</wfw:commentRss><description>If I recall the situation correctly, the correct structure was something like:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Main Repeating Section&lt;br /&gt;-- Non-Repeating Section&lt;br /&gt;---- Sub Repeating Section&lt;br /&gt;-- Non-Repeating Section&lt;br /&gt;---- Sub Repeating Section&lt;br /&gt;-- Non-Repeating Section&lt;br /&gt;---- Sub Repeating Section&lt;br /&gt;-- Non-Repeating Section&lt;br /&gt;---- Sub Repeating Section&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I.e. each sub repeating section was contained inside a non-repeating section, all of which was in the main repeating section.</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;spontaneous&amp;quot; instantiation of a repeating table</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11847.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:45:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:11847</guid><dc:creator>trufooser</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11847.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=11847</wfw:commentRss><description>a regular section should be inside the repeating section for each one of the child tables, correct?</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;spontaneous&amp;quot; instantiation of a repeating table</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11846.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:24:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:11846</guid><dc:creator>trufooser</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11846.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=11846</wfw:commentRss><description>tried that, no change.</description></item><item><title>Re: &amp;quot;spontaneous&amp;quot; instantiation of a repeating table</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11845.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:23:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:11845</guid><dc:creator>Greg Collins</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11845.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=11845</wfw:commentRss><description>I seem to recall running into this before, and that it was a "context" issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If I recall correctly, the solution was to put a containing section around each of the inner repeating sections.</description></item><item><title>"spontaneous" instantiation of a repeating table</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11700.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:00:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:11700</guid><dc:creator>trufooser</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/11700.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=43&amp;PostID=11700</wfw:commentRss><description>I have a parent table, Medical_Exam, and probably 6 child tables, Knee_Exam, Elbow_Exam, etc.  The Medical_Exam table has a one-to-many relationship with each on of the child tables.  And the child tables are not related to eachother.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Infopath, each child table is in a repeating section.  By default, there is no entry for the child exams.  However, if i were to then insert a new Elbow_Exam record, a Knee_Exam Hip_Exam etc section appears as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any ideas on why this happens and how to get it to stop?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks</description></item></channel></rss>