https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/41.aspxIf you're not sure where to ask your question, ask it here. If necessary, our moderators will make sure it gets classified in the correct board.enCommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/95158.aspxFri, 10 Jan 2014 21:15:03 GMT033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:95158jaxkookie0https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/95158.aspxhttps://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&PostID=95158<p>&nbsp;sorry for the bother. I solved this. I actually did a count of the field when it is not blank, then hide the rows where that field was blank, came back perfect</p>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/95156.aspxFri, 10 Jan 2014 20:57:45 GMT033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:95156jaxkookie0https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/95156.aspxhttps://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&PostID=95156<p>&nbsp;I understand the concept of alternating row color</p><p>(count(preceding-sibling::my:MyGroupName) + 1) mod 2 &gt; 0&nbsp;</p><p>or</p><p>position() mod 2 =0&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>but I have a table that displays specific data. I am hiding the other rows. when I apply the alternate row colow it applies it as if no rows are hidden. How can I apply this to only the visible rows?&nbsp;</p>