<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.infopathdev.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/41.aspx</link><description>If you're not sure where to ask your question, ask it here. If necessary, our moderators will make sure it gets classified in the correct board.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)</generator><item><title>Re: Digital signature problem</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/90222.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 15:13:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:90222</guid><dc:creator>michaelwoosley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/90222.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=90222</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Jo-Anne... the file is attached. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Digital signature problem</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/90203.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 01:52:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:90203</guid><dc:creator>Jo-Anne Alfafara</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/90203.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=90203</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi michaelwoosley,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you can upload your template, I can take a look.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Digital signature problem</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/90180.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 17:22:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:90180</guid><dc:creator>michaelwoosley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/90180.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=90180</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Jo-Anne, I had already tried your tip but for the sake of making sure, I re-verified.&amp;nbsp; For whatever reason, one signature is locking two others and I cannot figure out why.&amp;nbsp; If allowed, I could upload the file to see if you could see something wrong and to verify my predicament.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mike &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Digital signature problem</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/90159.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 01:29:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:90159</guid><dc:creator>Jo-Anne Alfafara</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/90159.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=90159</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi michaelwoosley,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When setting up the digital signature, which of these options did you select?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Allow only one signature &lt;/strong&gt;(To allow only one signature for this part of the form template)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b class="ui"&gt;All the signatures are independent (co-sign)&lt;/b&gt;. (To allow multiple signatures that are independent of each other, and that can be added or removed without affecting the other signatures)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b class="ui"&gt;Each signature signs the preceding signatures (counter-sign)&lt;/b&gt;. (To allow multiple signatures that sign preceding signatures)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Try selecting &lt;strong&gt;Allow only one signature&lt;/strong&gt; for each section and see if that solves the problem&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Digital signature problem</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/90070.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:31:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:90070</guid><dc:creator>michaelwoosley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/90070.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=90070</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello everyone.&amp;nbsp; I have a InfoPath 2007 form I designed which works great... but with one significant perplexing problem.&amp;nbsp; I have several sections on the form; Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 with each one having digital signatures assigned.&amp;nbsp; I have a case manager signing Section 1 and it does exactly what I want it to do; locks it up and indicates via a visual section who signed it.&amp;nbsp; Each of the 3 remaining sections have an employee who will verify and sign.&amp;nbsp; The problem is that when the Case manager signs Section 1, it secures Section 2 and Section 4 (locking all the fields) and leaves Section 3 unlocked (by design).&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the life of me, I cannot figure out why the act of signing in Section 1 is locking up these other 2 sections.&amp;nbsp; In the Case managers section, the &amp;quot;sign the following data in the form when this section is signed:&amp;quot; prompt is set for this person and the &amp;quot;fields and groups to be signed&amp;quot; is set to this section only; NOT the other 2.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t know what else to do, but I certainly hope that there is something I&amp;#39;m overlooking since I truly need this ability.&amp;nbsp; It does not make any sense why 1 section is left alone and the other two are locked by the action of Section 1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance for any help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mike &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>