<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.infopathdev.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/41.aspx</link><description>If you're not sure where to ask your question, ask it here. If necessary, our moderators will make sure it gets classified in the correct board.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)</generator><item><title>Re: Filter a repeating table from a secondary source</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/83562.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:23:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:83562</guid><dc:creator>wilkies0106aw</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/83562.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=83562</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Do you need the date and time function?&amp;nbsp; Can you not just change the Date and Time picker to be a Date Picker?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Check your original field default value&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The follow might help.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sSzl2311HA&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Filter a repeating table from a secondary source</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/83541.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:59:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:83541</guid><dc:creator>Hilary Stoupa</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/83541.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=83541</wfw:commentRss><description>Hard to tell what may have changed - but you could use a substring function to just return the date portion (before the T) and use that in your formatting.... That might be safer. Don&amp;#39;t worry about the question being confusing - it can be hard to know what to include.</description></item><item><title>Re: Filter a repeating table from a secondary source</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/83540.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:52:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:83540</guid><dc:creator>Paradiddle</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/83540.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=83540</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;It appears I was using Conditional Formatting and I am only displaying rows based on a field computed off a date.&amp;nbsp; The real issue is dates are&amp;nbsp;now including a time zone designation which breaks my condition.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Old format 2012-11-16T00:00:00&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;New format 2012-11-16T00:00:00-05:00&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the moment, I am not sure if something in Windows 7 changed or something in InfoPath 2010 changed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sorry if my original question was unclear, but I was lost&amp;nbsp;:(&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Filter a repeating table from a secondary source</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/83539.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:44:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:83539</guid><dc:creator>Hilary Stoupa</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/83539.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=83539</wfw:commentRss><description>When you say &amp;quot;filtered&amp;quot; - do you mean using the filter option on a repeating table? I actually won&amp;#39;t use that because I found it caused problems in browser forms sometimes, but had never bother to track down when the issues occurred. I use conditional formatting to hide rows instead.</description></item><item><title>Filter a repeating table from a secondary source</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/83536.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:25:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:83536</guid><dc:creator>Paradiddle</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/83536.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=83536</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;In the past week I have had several forms break and they all have one thing in common.&amp;nbsp; They have a repeating table based on a secondary data source that was filtered.&amp;nbsp; The forms were all developed in InfoPath 2007 and have not been changed for many months.&amp;nbsp; I have seen several posts on filtering secondary data sources and I believe that is the technique that I used.&amp;nbsp; However, when I attempt to modify the design of the forms in InfoPath 2010 it appears that you can no longer filter secondary data sources.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Several&amp;nbsp;InfoPath 2010 patches came out last week and we removed the patches and it fixed some of the forms but not all of them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can anyone confirm that filtering secondary data sources was removed from&amp;nbsp;InfoPath 2010?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>