<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.infopathdev.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/41.aspx</link><description>If you're not sure where to ask your question, ask it here. If necessary, our moderators will make sure it gets classified in the correct board.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)</generator><item><title>Sort data - performance issue</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/5663.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:33:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:5663</guid><dc:creator>Sash</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/5663.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=5663</wfw:commentRss><description>Hello, &lt;br /&gt;We try to sort xml data using approach of Assets Tracking sample. They say it takes for a considerable time to sort for about a hundred nodes (20 seconds on Celeron 1.8). It looks a litle bit strange as there are no any complex calculations in the solution. Is it possible to optimize this approach?</description></item></channel></rss>