<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.infopathdev.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/41.aspx</link><description>If you're not sure where to ask your question, ask it here. If necessary, our moderators will make sure it gets classified in the correct board.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)</generator><item><title>Re: Repeating Tables, breaking apart the data</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/45790.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:19:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:45790</guid><dc:creator>KarenSL</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/45790.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=45790</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the info.&amp;nbsp; Question about the hack...how do I tell it to run the rules on the delete?&amp;nbsp; With what I have now,&amp;nbsp;I have rules on the department field in the repeating table to move the data around into separate fields based on the sequence number&amp;nbsp;except on the row delete it&amp;#39;s not running the rules if all the user does is delete a row...meaning, if they delete a row and add a new one the rules sorts itself out, but if they only delete a row and submit the form, the rules don&amp;#39;t run so even though it&amp;#39;s gone in the form, the fields aren&amp;#39;t getting updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks again!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Repeating Tables, breaking apart the data</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/45772.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:49:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:45772</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Halstead</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/45772.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=45772</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Karen,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s a SharePoint limitation. It&amp;#39;s the main reason we developed our DBXL Web Service (Qdabra.com -&amp;gt; Products -&amp;gt; DBXL) 5 years ago and one of the reasons it is so popular. SharePoint schema is flat. You can&amp;#39;t map variable node repeating groups to a SharePoint list/library because SharePoint lists/libraries are limited to a fixed number of columns. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacky solution is to promote the values for your departments as separate fields: deptA, deptB and deptC. Add a rule that copies values from deptC to deptB when it is deleted. You&amp;#39;ll need another rule for when deptA is deleted to copy from deptB to deptA and deptC to deptB. You&amp;#39;ll be limited to number of columns you can do this with though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;General best practice is to map your data to SQL tabes (parent-child) and display the SQL data in a data view. Download our free DBXL trial. Set up a Database mapping and then use a Data View (use SharePoint Designer to define) to pull your data into a web page. If you like DBXL, the pricing starts at $395 for a beginner license. Cheap considering all of the value you get.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An even cheaper option is to use our free qRules which will support mapping XML to SharePoint lists when version 2.0 comes out. We&amp;#39;re looking for energetic beta testers who will spend a couple hours testing for a free copy of qRules 2.0 (currently, 1.7 is free but we expect to sell 2.0 for $199). Beta testers will get it for free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry I couldn&amp;#39;t give you a silver bullet!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Repeating Tables, breaking apart the data</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/45726.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:14:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:45726</guid><dc:creator>KarenSL</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/45726.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=41&amp;PostID=45726</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m sure this has been discussed a million times, but I&amp;#39;m not finding what I need.&amp;nbsp; I have a form with a repeating table and&amp;nbsp;one of the fields I need to promote to Sharepoint in individual fields.&amp;nbsp; How do I get those values from the repeating table split into the separate fields?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Example, it&amp;#39;s a routing form..The form needs to route to 3 departments so 3 lines are added to the table, deptA, deptB, and deptC.&amp;nbsp; I need the field Routing1 = deptA; Routing2&amp;nbsp;= deptB; and Routing3 = deptC.&amp;nbsp; If someone comes along and deletes a row, say deptB, I need the fields setup as: Routing1 = deptA; Routing2 = deptC; Routing3 = blank.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m setup to handle up to 20 rows and have 20 fields setup in SP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m running IP2007, no access to the code-behind, SP2007 MOSS, browser-based form&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;As a side note, I have this mostly figured out by way of any time a new row is added it checks the sequence number and moves in the value...the problem I&amp;#39;m having is on the deletion, it&amp;#39;s not handling the value changes so I&amp;#39;m hoping that if I build the fields just before they go into SP, it&amp;#39;ll help alleviate that problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for any suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Karen.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>