<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.infopathdev.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>InfoPath 2010</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/142.aspx</link><description>Are you exploring new features coming up in 2010? Share information and ask questions here!</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)</generator><item><title>Re: Very slow performace to edit great view</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/92061.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 18:51:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:92061</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Halstead</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/92061.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=142&amp;PostID=92061</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi SGSSergio and welcome!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edit performance for the filler (desktop) is a function of the size of the view, number of window controls in it, and rules triggered when tabbing out of fields.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have done forms with large tables (200 rows x 20 columns) and they work fine in the InfoPath client but if you add rules and have updates, performance can degrade.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, if you have&amp;nbsp;a large dropdown in the table, that will create a lot of window controls (one for each value) because it multiplies those controls for each row where the dropdown exists.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have a large table, a simple thing to do is to implement paging - in other words, don&amp;#39;t show all rows. See attached sample.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another thing you should do is inspect the rules to make sure it isn&amp;#39;t running a lot of logic to update fields.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Very slow performace to edit great view</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/92051.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:45:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:92051</guid><dc:creator>sgssergio</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/92051.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=142&amp;PostID=92051</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;nbsp;have a infotpath 2010 form with a form with a custom table (using a custom xsl ). This form I use in Desktop mode (non browse-enabled).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My problem is when I to edit any field of the table, the firt time the edit performance&amp;nbsp; is succesful, but changing to other text field the performance degrade very much. The infopath is hanged during about 2-3 second upto permit edit the new field. The user experiencie is very bad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I monitoring the I/O rate and detect that the infopath acces a lot to the Registry and temp file for each edit operation. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Example: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xml infopath form&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;size: 230 Kb.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I write one (1) character in a text field into one table and the Microsoft Sysinternal Process Monitor register ore than 200 I/O acces (the most case write operations) and about 200 acces to the registry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is posible configure the infopath to cache the edit data and only flush the data to the disk few times?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is posible to instruct the infopath (in the config or using code) to disable de autoupdate del forma in each text field edit?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is the recomendation to improve the editing performance in Infopath 2010 forms?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>