https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/142.aspxAre you exploring new features coming up in 2010? Share information and ask questions here!enCommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/75788.aspxTue, 28 Feb 2012 12:52:29 GMT033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:75788ErnestoM0https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/75788.aspxhttps://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=142&PostID=75788<p>As far as I know, there&#39;s no way to accomplish this. You&#39;ve run into an annoying InfoPath limitation that I&#39;ve run into before. Sadly I have to re-do the formatting on the table if I re-bind it.<br /></p>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/75764.aspxMon, 27 Feb 2012 20:44:48 GMT033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:75764PaulRAnderson0https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/75764.aspxhttps://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=142&PostID=75764<p>I have a repeating table that I would like to split into three repeating tables, referencing three different repeating&nbsp;groups.</p><p>If I copy the table, I can change the bindings on the fields.&nbsp; But when I try to change the binding on the table itself, I choose the repeating group I want, and then am faced with the &quot;Repeating Table Binding&quot; dialog box in which I am forced to choose what columns I want to show in the table.&nbsp; Once I choose one or more columns, the formatting of the new repeating table is replaced by the columns in a generic format.</p><p>So I have now lost the custom formatting of the table.&nbsp; I would like the new tables to have the exact same formatting as the first and don&#39;t want to have to draw a new table, as this is tedious and won&#39;t look exactly like the first one anyway.</p><p>Is there a way to do this?</p><p>Paul</p>