<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.infopathdev.com:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>InfoPath 2010</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/142.aspx</link><description>Are you exploring new features coming up in 2010? Share information and ask questions here!</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP3 (Build: 31118.962)</generator><item><title>Re: Formatting Rules on Repeating Table within Multiple Item Form</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/119919.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 08:28:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:119919</guid><dc:creator>caladanbrood</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/119919.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=142&amp;PostID=119919</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi Hilary,

I&amp;#39;ve moved on a bit from where I was, and sorted out this specific issue by changing the repeating table to a drop-down list which triggers a separate data connection.

However, the same issue still applies to the findings displayed in the bottom section of the form. I&amp;#39;ve attached it so you can take a look.

Thanks,
Jon</description></item><item><title>Re: Formatting Rules on Repeating Table within Multiple Item Form</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/119904.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:06:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:119904</guid><dc:creator>Hilary Stoupa</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/119904.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=142&amp;PostID=119904</wfw:commentRss><description>Any chance you can attach a copy of your form in a reply (under the Options tab)?</description></item><item><title>Formatting Rules on Repeating Table within Multiple Item Form</title><link>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/119900.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 14:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">033a2e2d-04e2-4a9d-be01-a4634161eefd:119900</guid><dc:creator>caladanbrood</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/thread/119900.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://www.infopathdev.com:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=142&amp;PostID=119900</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi,

I&amp;#39;ve often been able to find solutions for my Infopath issues on these forums, but I&amp;#39;ve finally come across a problem which I can&amp;#39;t find any answer for.


I am using a multi-item Infopath 2010 form with a SharePoint list. Within the form, I have some static sections (using preceding-sibling rules to make it look like they&amp;#39;re not changing to the end user), and one insertable section. This all works fine.


The issue I have is around the following: I have repeating tables within the insertable section linked to another list. I have a concatenated text string (my:SectionClauses, which is a double-eval string using the syntax: &amp;quot; &amp;quot;,ID,&amp;quot;¬ &amp;quot;) which defines which items in the repeating table I want to appear. I am using a repeating table because I need to have a button which the user can use to remove each specific item from the table if it is not relevant to the section.


I put a rule on the table to Hide when Section Clauses does not contain concat(&amp;quot; &amp;quot;,ID,&amp;quot;¬&amp;quot;). This works fine, but only if I don&amp;#39;t insert another section. When I add a second section, the repeating table looks at my:SectionClauses from the first section... Although my:SectionClauses are filling correctly for each new item inserted, the formatting rules for the table are not working correctly.

I&amp;#39;ve attached a screenshot which hopefully shows the relevant parts.


Have I missed something obvious? Is there another useful xpath phrase like preceding-sibling which might sort this out for me, to force the formatting to look at the node it sits within?</description></item></channel></rss>